What does it mean to be in love with someone and not have expectations? Unfit expectations and unspoken expectations ruin relationships but no expectation along with romance means no standard but love freely given out like candy… is that true love? Does romance require attachment and qualities of specific value? Everyone has expectations; I expect my ex gf to not turn into an alpaca and gore me. My good friends expect me to exhibit the majority of values I have shown consistent which our friendship is based upon. Everyone has expectations. To fit that argument, people need deliberate standard. Otherwise love is just a constant spewed emotion, an affair with entropy governed by apathy. I wager that to be in love with someone is relative to how high you think of them equating to how high you feel because they love you back. So to love anyone means that you have no real standard as to who is high, low, amazing or boring. Being in love with someone and loving someone are very different or maybe connotation screws people more than the all Earth’s whores and pharmaceutical stores.
Romance is a dicey bird. To fall head over heels in love with someone means some form of rush in a new category of knowing the self. They bring a new art, a different scene and now a whole new world blows up with a tour guide who tears apart the darkness from your insides with their lips and soft eyes. So, is attachment a requirement for love? Because that makes a person not free and those in love, dependent. There lays a certain balance in giving yourself to someone else in order to have another. Without this balance there is not a fair romance. A big problem with romance and why love only lasts a short while for many is because they do not find romance to stay balanced with how they fluctuate. Because everyone needs a degree of autonomy to exist and love gives us more but only in promise of a piece of ourselves we give them too.
